Ticket sales on the upswing for Panthers
Pitt athletic director Steve Pederson said football season-ticket sales are "seven percent ahead" of last year, when the Panthers' 42,000 tickets sold ranked third-highest in school history.
"We are on pace to surpass that total right now," Pederson said. "The momentum has been great. I think this is a result of the success we had last season and that this is a great value in the marketplace. When you can come see great college football at an affordable price, it makes a great difference."
• Of the position battles, the one that concerns Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt most is finding a tailback to replace leading rushers LeSean McCoy and LaRod Stephens-Howling. Redshirt sophomore Shariff Harris and freshmen Chris Burns, Ray Graham, Jason Hendricks and Dion Lewis will compete for the starting job.
"We have to run the ball," Wannstedt said. "Getting that player — or committee of players — ready to go is a challenge. ... You'd like to have one, but that's a luxury. Most of the great ones I've been around — the Hall of Famers and All-Pros — have to get their 20 carries to be effective. It would be great if someone separated himself from the pack during two-a-days."
• Wannstedt said the only incoming freshman who didn't qualify academically is Todd Thomas, a receiver from Beaver Falls. Thomas is expected to attend Milford Academy in New Berlin, N.Y., and could enroll in January if he meets NCAA guidelines.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.