Pitt's Hutchins wins kicking jobs
College Football Videos
• Pitt redshirt junior Dan Hutchins opened training camp as a walk-on punter from Williamsport and ended the month as a scholarship player with two starting jobs. Hutchins, expected to be the starting punter, beat out Kevin Harper, a scholarship player from Mentor, Ohio, for the place-kicking duties. So Hutchins will handle both. Coach Dave Wannstedt rewarded Hutchins over the weekend by putting him on scholarship. Redshirt sophomore holder Andrew Janocko, another former walk-on, also earned a scholarship.
"It's a real positive thing for those kids and for our program," Wannstedt said. "A lot of schools talk about rewarding these young players who walk on and it's easier said than done."
• In the return game, Aaron Smith will handle punt returns, and Cameron Saddler and Antwuan Reed will be kickoff returners. Luke Briggs is the kickoff specialist and John Fieger, a redshirt sophomore, is the long-snapper.
• Perhaps the tightest job in training camp was at left guard, where senior Joe Thomas beat out redshirt sophomore Chris Jacobson. The biggest factor was experience. Thomas has started 27 games, second-most on the team.
"You want to play your best players that give you the best chance to win," Wannstedt said. "In early games like this you are going to see new things and I think Joe's game experience gives us the best chance to be successful right now."
• Pitt's nine national championship trophies and the Steelers' six Super Bowl Lombardi Trophies will be on display prior to the Panthers' opener against Youngstown State on Saturday in Heinz Field's Coca-Cola Great Hall.
Former Pitt coach Johnny Majors will also be signing autographs from 11:15 p.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.