ShareThis Page

Pitt LB Williams comes to play in victory

| Sunday, Sept. 13, 2009

AMHERST, N.Y. — Pitt linebacker Greg Williams didn't endear himself to defensive coordinator Phil Bennett after a season-opening, 38-3 win over Youngstown State.

Bennett said earlier this week that Williams was somewhat out of sync.

Williams redeemed himself Saturday. He had five tackles and returned a fumble 50 yards to give Pitt a 40-20 lead with 8:42 left in the third quarter.

Said Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt, "[Williams] needed that. He was real serious all week. He didn't play well last week and bounced back."

· When Dan Hutchins pushed his kick wide right late in the first quarter, it ended a streak of 120 successful extra point attempts for Pitt. The Panthers' last missed extra point came in the 2005 finale against West Virginia. Conor Lee went 113 for 113 from 2006-08 at Pitt.

· Pitt starting free safety Andrew Taglianetti suffered a left knee sprain with 8:24 left in the first half on a Buffalo kick return. Taglianetti, who was replaced by Elijah Fields, did not return in the second half. Wannstedt said Taglianetti will have an MRI today.

· Pitt freshman tailback Dion Lewis put together another solid performance. He rushed for 190 yards and two touchdowns on 24 carries. And he did it in front of 15 family members who made the trek from Albany, N.Y. He thrilled his family and Wannstedt with an 85-yard touchdown run to clinch Pitt's victory. Lewis' touchdown run was the longest since David Priestly scored on 85-yard run in the first game at Heinz Field against East Tennessee State on Sept. 1, 2001.

· Former Pitt All-America offensive lineman Ruben Brown, a nine-time Pro Bowler with the Buffalo Bulls from 1997-2005, was in attendance at UB Stadium. For the record, he was wearing Pitt gear.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.