Gunn holds down starting LB spot for Pitt
Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt said there will be no shuffling to find a starting spot for freshman middle linebacker Dan Mason, who earned Big East Defensive Player of the Week honors after his team-high 11-tackle, two-sack performance against Navy last Saturday. Senior Adam Gunn, if healthy, is the starting middle linebacker, and redshirt sophomores Greg Williams and Max Gruder will start outside. Gunn remains day-to-day for Saturday's game at North Carolina State.
• Wannstedt said playing time for reserve quarterback Tino Sunseri remains a game-by-game situation. Sunseri, who came off the bench late in the third quarter, was pulled after one series against Navy when the Panthers' lead was cut to 10 points with 11 minutes to play.
• Senior quarterback Bill Stull, who's completed 49 of 70 passes for 540 yards, is ranked 17th in the nation in passing efficiency at 160.23.
"I feel so much more comfortable," Stull said. "We're taking what the defense gives us. Somebody is going to be open. It's my job to go through the progression and find somebody who's open."
• Freshman tailback Dion Lewis, held to 79 yards against Navy, still ranks sixth in the nation in rushing at 132.7 yards per game. He's the only freshman in the top 10.
• Senior defensive tackle Gus Mustakas said the Panthers haven't proved anything with their first 3-0 start since 2000.
"We can't get big-headed at all," he said. "(Facing N.C. State) will be a great test for our team to see really where we are at."
• Despite its 27-14 win over Navy, Pitt dropped two spots — to No. 29 — in the "others receiving votes" in the latest AP poll. Three teams with high-profile wins — Washington, Auburn and Florida State — vaulted past the Panthers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.