ShareThis Page

Small proves big for Pitt in win over EKU

| Friday, Nov. 20, 2009

Pitt played its three shortest players at the same time against Eastern Kentucky — and still tied a school record for blocked shots.

The Panthers switched to a three-guard offense late in the first half and used the diminutive lineup to pull away from Eastern Kentucky en route to a 71-60 victory Thursday night at Petersen Events Center.

Pitt (3-0) played guards Travon Woodall, Ashton Gibbs and Chase Adams simultaneously for the first time this season. The plan worked against the Ohio Valley Conference school, as the trio was on the floor for the majority of game-altering 11-0 run to end the first half.

"That small lineup did bother us," Eastern Kentucky coach Jeff Neubauer said, "but I made mistakes personnel-wise as well."

Pitt ended the first half with 11 straight points, holding Eastern Kentucky scoreless over the final 6:57 to take a 39-24 lead into the break.

Pitt's big men also chipped in, as the Panthers outrebounded Eastern Kentucky, 47-25, and blocked 12 shots, equaling a school record set against St. Francis (Pa.) on Dec. 1, 1993.

Centers Gary McGhee and Dante Taylor each had four blocks, and Woodall, a 5-foot-11 guard, had two.

Two days after scoring a career-high 22 points against Binghamton, Gibbs scored a team-high 20 points to lead the Panthers.

Nasir Robinson added 15 points, and freshman Lamar Patterson had 10 points off the bench. Taylor grabbed a game-high 12 rebounds, and Brad Wanamaker matched his career-high with eight rebounds.

Junior guard Justin Stommes scored a game-high 24 points to lead Eastern Kentucky (1-1). Brentwood High School graduate Josh Taylor scored 11 points on 4 of 10 shooting

"Obviously, it was exciting for me to come home and play in front of my family and friends," Josh Taylor said. "We played hard, but we've got to come out and shoot better."

The Panthers, who never trailed, switched to a pint-sized lineup with 5:30 to play in the first half. Foul trouble by Wanamaker and Robinson, combined with Eastern Kentucky's 1-3-1 zone, prompted coach Jamie Dixon to go small against the Colonel's taller sharpshooters, including the 6-6 Taylor and 6-7 Stommes.

The 6-2 Gibbs and two sub-6-footers, Woodall and Adams, joined 6-5 freshman Lamar Patterson, playing power forward for the first time, and 6-9 freshman center Dante Taylor in the lineup.

"My biggest concern was guarding their big shooters," Dixon said. "We wanted to have quickness guarding them and not have our big guys chasing them. We wanted to keep smaller guys on them."

The Panthers led, 30-24, at the time. Over the final five minutes of the first half, Gibbs scored seven points during the 11-0 run, and Pitt's undersized defense held Eastern Kentucky to 0 for 9 from the field in the final 7:35 of the first half. Pitt led, 39-24, at halftime.

"If we lock them down on defense," Gibbs said, "(Coach Dixon) will let any combination play."

Eastern Kentucky pulled to within 45-35 with 13:24 to play in the second half, but the Panthers answered with a 10-2 run for a 55-37 lead on Robinson's layup with 10:29 to play. The Colonels made it 59-48 on a pair of Stommes 3-pointers with 7:51 to play, but Pitt scored the next five points and led by double-digits until the final minute.

Eastern Kentucky, picked to finish fifth in the Ohio Valley Conference, used a series of backdoor cuts and 3-point shots to stick with Pitt for much of the first half. The Colonels trailed, 14-12, midway through the first half and used back-to-back 3-pointers from Stommes and Taylor to pull to within 25-22 with 7:35 to play in the first half. Pitt went with the smallish lineup and Eastern Kentucky scored two points - both free throws - the rest of the first half.

"Pitt is a great defensive team," Neubauer said. "That's why they've been dominant for the last decade."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.