Pitt coach not fond of statement by linemen
Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt isn't a fan of his players drawing attention to themselves with their outward appearance — especially before the Backyard Brawl — so he was a bit torn about his starting offensive linemen sporting bleached-blonde Mohawk haircuts this week.
"You better be ready to back it up — that's what I told them," said Wannstedt, a left tackle at Pitt in the early 1970s. "The great thing about playing the offensive line is nobody knows who you are except the people in that meeting room and that building. We know how important they are.
"They all did it, and (right guard) John Malecki's mother (Angela) is a hairdresser, so I'm sure they did it for free. Those two things, that sounds like offensive linemen: they all did it together and they got it for free."
· The Panthers are preparing for their trip to Morgantown by practicing to music familiar to the Mountaineers. John Denver's "Take Me Home, Country Roads" has been blaring through loudspeakers all week.
"It's funny," senior tight end Dorin Dickerson said. "Every year we prepare for West Virginia, they play that song — not their fight song; I don't even know what song it is — every day at our practice. It gets us real excited at practice. I can't wait to play this week."
· Dickerson isn't paying much attention to his spot as one of three finalists for the Mackey Award, presented to the nation's best tight end, but he is aware that West Virginia's 3-5-3 stack defense won't allow as many mismatches as he's seen this season because it employs three safeties. But Dickerson does see a bright side to the dilemma.
"They do drop down the safeties a lot, and that might not be too good for me," Dickerson said, "but it's just going to open someone else up."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.