ShareThis Page

Duquesne tops Fordham in offensive affair

| Saturday, March 6, 2010

As Ron Everhart strode into the press room Friday for his usual postgame meeting with the media, a reporter joked with the Duquesne basketball coach about a perceived lack of defense in the Dukes' 111-100 victory over Fordham.

"I'm sure you've all probably been discussing how well we defended today," Everhart deadpanned.

When someone suggested that the Dukes' defense improved against the Rams from the first half (51 points) to the second half (49), Everhart cracked: "We've never been worried about that here. We went from 52 to 59 on offense. That's the key stat."

Then, with a wink, the fourth-year coach was all smiles, even though his team struggled at times against Atlantic 10 Conference doormat Fordham, which lost its 21st consecutive game and became the first A-10 team to go winless in conference play in a season since St. Bonaventure was 0-14 in an eight-team conference in 1992-93.

"It's good to actually look back at the scoresheet after a couple of years and see a game where both teams have three digits on the scoreboard," Everhart said. "I guess maybe I'm in my comfort zone there."

Melquan Bolding scored a career-high 32 points, and Eric Evans and Bill Clark produced double-doubles to lead Duquesne to the wild victory at Palumbo Center in the regular-season finale for both teams.

Evans finished with career-highs of 23 points and 10 assists for his first career double-double, and Clark had 20 points and 10 rebounds for his third double-double of the season and sixth of his career.

Damian Saunders (17 points) also scored in double figures for Duquesne (16-14, 7-9), which would play host to a first-round home game Tuesday night in the A-10 Tournament if Charlotte, Massachusetts and No. 25 Xavier win their scheduled home games.

"We needed this win to build back our confidence," Evans said.

Duquesne, which produced three 20-point scorers in a game for the first time since 1997, was coming off two consecutive losses, including 92-80 at St. Bonaventure two days earlier.

Yesterday's game was moved up one day to a noon start time to accommodate two days of WPIAL basketball playoffs at Palumbo Center.

Brenton Butler led Fordham (2-26, 0-16) with 29 points. Freshman Chris Gaston added 21 points and 18 rebounds for his 19th double-double, tying Saunders for the conference lead.

Also, Alberto Eastwick had 20 points and Lance Brown scored 18 for the Rams, whose only victories this season came against Sacred Heart and Stony Brook in nonconference games.

Duquesne led at halftime, 52-51, despite missing its first 11 shots. Bolding scored 16 first-half points, and Evans had 14.

But Fordham, relying on 3-point shots, rallied to take a 69-64 lead before Duquesne regained control for an 86-80 advantage, when Saunders scored six consecutive points, capped by a dunk with 7:48 remaining.

"It seemed like Fordham hit more 3s than that (11 for 24)," Bolding said. "It was anything we could do to get the win."

Duquesne, which ranked among Division I's leaders in scoring offense while playing a a primarily hectic pace in Everhart's first three seasons, has displayed a more traditional style for much of this season.

But after enduring a midseason, five-game losing streak, the Dukes, who converted 13 of 32 3-point shots and made 24 of 34 free throws, have turned up the pace again. They notched their second 100-point game of the season.

The 111 points represent the most scored in a game by an A-10 team this season and matches Duquesne's most in a game since it scored the same total in consecutive games in February 2007.

"We hate structure. We always have," Everhart said. "That's been my battle with these guys all year. The more structure, the worse for us. I think I've said this before: If we're going to play a game like that, I like our team."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.