Gorman: Big East expansion makes it look small
TribLIVE Sports Videos
With its college football relevance and reputation on the line, the Big East once again revealed itself as nothing more than a basketball league masquerading as a BCS conference.
After a summer of squirming while the Big Ten and Pac-10 increased their memberships to a dozen schools apiece in order to hold conference championship games, the Big East voted unanimously to expand from eight to 10 teams.
That does little to enhance its reputation.
If convincing Villanova to move up to the Football Bowl Subdivision and adding TCU or Central Florida for football is the best the Big East can come up with, the conference only will become more vulnerable to another raid.
It should come as no surprise for a conference in which the smallest school, Providence, has provided all three commissioners that the Big East first and foremost wants to preserve the basketball identity it was built upon.
That should not sit well with football members Pitt, West Virginia, Cincinnati, Connecticut, Louisville, Rutgers, South Florida and Syracuse. It's time for them to deliver the Big East an ultimatum: Either Notre Dame joins in football or they are splitting from the Catholic schools in basketball.
Yes, it's come to that.
Notre Dame has been adamant that it wants to maintain its football independence, and the Big East has been a convenient home for the Fighting Irish. Their basketball and other programs have a place to play without having to share their NBC television revenue for football.
That has to change, and both the Big East and Notre Dame could benefit.
With Notre Dame and Villanova, the conference could expand to a 10-team football conference and have room for two more football-only members. The Irish would still have three games to play national opponents yet could contend for the Big East title and its automatic BCS bid.
Even this is a stop-gap measure — and a far-fetched one — that doesn't solve the Big East's biggest problem: it is the only conference with an eight-team football league, which requires five nonconference games, and a 16-team basketball league, which requires an 18-game schedule.
Although the concept of 16-team mega-conferences was put on hold when Texas opted to remain in the Big 12 rather than pursue Pac-10 membership, it's only a matter of time before the ACC, Big Ten, Pac-10 and SEC consider further expansion — no doubt at the Big East's expense.
It's no secret that a handful of Big East football members would leave for the Big Ten in a heartbeat if offered an invitation. Rutgers appears to be the preferred choice, if only because it offers entry into the New York footprint that the Big Ten Network so desperately wants.
One school to leave the Big East is all it takes for the floodgates to open. Remember, the ACC raid began with Miami but later included Boston College and Virginia Tech. Going to a 10-team football conference won't prevent any of the current members from bolting the Big East.
It's easy to picture Pitt, West Virginia, Connecticut and Syracuse in the ACC, where they could join Boston College, Maryland, Virginia and Virginia Tech to form a North Division opposite Clemson, Duke, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami, North Carolina, N.C. State and Wake Forest.
This isn't to sell the Big East short. If nothing else, the conference has repeatedly reinvented itself.
When the Big East wanted to form a football league in the early 1990s, it added Miami and Virginia Tech to existing members Boston College, Pitt and Syracuse and invited Rutgers, Temple and West Virginia as football-only members. When the conference appeared doomed in 2004, it survived by adding Cincinnati, Louisville and South Florida in all sports, as well as DePaul and Marquette in basketball.
But those moves made the Big East lopsided and left little wiggle room for the next wave of expansion. The insistence on maintaining its identity could wind up costing the conference some of its best basketball programs, unless they are willing to risk their reputations as football schools. And, eventually, that automatic BCS bid.
Then, there will be no debating the Big East's relevance.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.