ShareThis Page

Pitt pounds overmatched Illinois-Chicago

| Thursday, Nov. 11, 2010

Unlike its season opener, fifth-ranked Pitt never gave visiting Illinois-Chicago a chance at pulling off an upset at Petersen Events Center on Wednesday night.

Even with victory assured early in the second half, coach Jamie Dixon didn't pull his starters until the Panthers stretched their lead over the Flames to 38 points in the waning minutes.

Guard Ashton Gibbs scored a game-high 24 points and dished out a career-high seven assists to lead the Panthers to a 97-54 win in the second round of the 2K Sports Classic Benefiting Coaches vs. Cancer tournament.

The Panthers (2-0) dominated both the offensive and defensive boards in sprinting to an early double-digit lead. The Flames (0-1) flamed out midway through the first half, mostly because they couldn't compete on the glass.

"We were excited," said Gibbs, who tallied 13 first-half points. "We didn't play as well defensively in the first half, but offensively we took advantage of what they gave us."

The Panthers, who shot 70 percent in the second half, were ignited by the hot shooting of Brad Wanamaker (17 points) and Gilbert Brown (12 points). And they outmuscled UIC for a 16-3 rebounding advantage to take a 26-10 lead midway through the first half.

The Flames, who didn't have a single steal, gift-wrapped this victory for Pitt as Dixon celebrated his birthday. UIC made just 12 of 30 field goal attempts in the first half, while Pitt was 16 of 34.

Brown and Wanamaker scored all but three of Pitt's first 19 points to stake the Panthers to a 43-29 lead at the half.

The Flames, getting team highs of 12 points and five rebounds from K.C. Robbins, were hammered on the boards, 45-25. They were out-rebounded, 26-12, in the first half - including an 11-3 advantage in offensive rebounds.

"We did some good things early, but they killed us on the glass," UIC coach Howard Moore said. "They came at us tough and tried to bury us."

The Panthers eased up some at the close of the first half, but steamrolled the Flames early in the second. Gibbs and Wanamaker scored nine straight during a 12-2 run to give Pitt a commanding 55-31 lead with 15:14 remaining.

"Our offense is versatile, and it makes teams play us honestly defensively," said Wanamaker, who added nine assists and six rebounds.

"There was improvement in the last five days," Dixon said. "With the last game being unique in style, we were looking at getting after it on both ends of the floor."

Notes: The Panthers, who will host North Florida at 4 p.m. Saturday, have won 49 consecutive home games against nonconference opponents and improved to 98-1 in its past 99 home games against non-Big East teams. ... The Panthers shot 58 percent from the floor against a UIC team that finished next to last in the Horizon League last season - 15 games behind Final Four runner-up Butler.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.