ShareThis Page

West Virginia steamrolls Pitt in Backyard Brawl

| Saturday, Nov. 27, 2010

Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt stood on the sideline looking like a beaten prizefighter as time expired Friday at the 103rd Backyard Brawl.

As a largely disappointed crowd of 60,562 lumbered out of Heinz Field, Wannstedt labored toward the locker room after watching his uninspired Panthers get out-punched in a 35-10 defeat.

"I really thought we would play better," a somber Wannstedt said. "We didn't."

The Panthers, their chances of claiming the Big East title now an uphill climb, were physically dominated by West Virginia (8-3, 4-2). But Pitt (6-5, 4-2) beat itself up, too, by committing four turnovers.

"Everybody understood, approached and prepared, I thought, as well as we could have prepared," said Wannstedt, who fell to 2-4 in this rivalry. "Obviously, it's disappointing. We just didn't make enough plays."

Pitt dropped into a tie with West Virginia atop the conference, but Connecticut (6-4, 3-2) holds the tiebreaker after beating both. The Huskies close vs. Cincinnati today and at South Florida next week; a pair of wins would earn the Huskies the Big East title and an automatic BCS bowl berth.

The Mountaineers, who won their third straight, overwhelmed Pitt in the second half after leading, 14-7, at halftime. West Virginia, which had only two second-half touchdowns in conference play this season, tallied three on its first four drives of the half.

West Virginia totaled seven plays on three scoring drives to take a 21-7 lead early in the third quarter. Then, the Mountaineers put together two time-consuming scoring drives — including an 11-play, 76-yard march capped by Ryan Clarke's 2-yard run with 7:45 left for the final points.

"I was uneasy in the first half because I didn't see that zip we had the last couple of weeks," West Virginia coach Bill Stewart said. "But we rallied and kept them out of the end zone."

In a season in which the Panthers have had no clear identity, their opening possession was typically puzzling. The Panthers shifted gears from a week ago, when they pounded Dion Lewis between the tackles against South Florida to establish a physical presence. This time, they tried out-finessing the Mountaineers, throwing the ball exclusively.

The West Virginia secondary left the door open a couple of times for Pitt quarterback Tino Sunseri. Then, they slammed it shut: Cornerback Brandon Hogan intercepted a wobbly pass and returned it 53 yards to the Pitt 2.

The Mountaineers cashed in on the miscue to take a 7-0 lead just 2:34 into the game when Clarke powered into the end zone on West Virginia's first play from scrimmage.

"It's frustrating because we didn't do enough," said Sunseri, who was 28 of 46 for 284 yards. "If we don't turn the ball over, it's a lot different game."

Sunseri redeemed himself on the Panthers' next possession. He scrambled for 21 yards on third-and-8 to keep alive an eight-play, 59-yard scoring drive. It ended with an 8-yard touchdown pass to Devin Street with 2:33 left in the quarter to tie the score at 7.

The Panthers twice positioned themselves to score in the second quarter but couldn't finish either drive because of fumbles by Lewis and fellow running back Ray Graham. West Virginia tailback Noel Devine pulled in a swing pass from Geno Smith, then raced 48 yards down the right sideline before safety Jarred Holley tripped him up at the Pitt 2. Smith found Will Johnson for a 2-yard score to make it 14-7 with 4:33 left in the half.

The hole got deeper when West Virginia stretched its lead to 21-7 only 97 seconds into the second half. Smith targeted oft-maligned Pitt cornerback Antwuan Reed, catching him in man-to-man coverage against receiver Tavon Austin. Reed, flagged for four pass interference penalties at South Florida, didn't lay a glove on Austin, who gathered in Smith's floater for a 71-yard touchdown.

"I don't know if our confidence was shaken a little bit or what," Wannstedt said. "But we missed some tackles in the second half that we made in the first half."

Receiver Jon Baldwin ignited a spark for Pitt with a 48-yard reception to the West Virginia 25 on the ensuing possession. But Sunseri misfired on three passes, forcing Pitt to settle for a 42-yard field goal by Dan Hutchins with 6:13 left in the third quarter.

The Mountaineers went up, 28-10, when Smith engineered a 10-play, 67-yard touchdown drive. He threw a 12-yard pass to Austin with 1:29 left in the quarter for a 28-10 lead, and the Panthers never recovered.

"Things just started to slip away slowly," Graham said. "All we can do right now is move on."

Photo Galleries

Pitt vs. WVU The Backyard Brawl 11/26/10

Pitt vs. WVU  The Backyard Brawl  11/26/10

West Virginia defeats Pitt, 35-10, in the 103rd Backyard Brawl Friday November 26, 2010 at Heinz Field.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.