Paterno endorses defensive coach Tom Bradley for Pitt job
College Football Videos
Penn State coach Joe Paterno said yesterday that his longtime defensive coordinator Tom Bradley should be seriously considered by Pitt to become the Panthers' next football coach.
"If they ask me, I would tell them," Paterno said. "I think Tommy is a fine coach. He has good, strong city of Pittsburgh contacts. He's got a brother (Jim) who is an orthopedic surgeon, head surgeon for the Steelers. I think Tommy should be a very, very prominent person as a possibility.
"Tommy has done a good job. He is a good recruiter, a good coach, he's organized."
Paterno said he doesn't know what direction Pitt's search is headed, but offered some thoughts about how the process of hiring college football coaches has changed.
"Ben Schwartzwalder (the former Syracuse coach) used to say an athletic director can fire one football coach; he can't fire two. The second one, (the athletic director) is gone," Paterno said. "That was the old rule. Things have changed.
"A lot of these guys have never played football who are making these decisions. (They are) letting too many people outside the organization have that kind of impact."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.