Pitt's Romeus plans to attend NFL Scouting Combine
College Football Videos
Former Pitt defensive end Greg Romeus is recovering from knee surgery and plans to attend the NFL Scouting Combine from Feb. 23 to March 1 in Indianapolis. He won't work out but will be interviewed by team officials and examined by doctors, said Drew Smith, his agent.
Romeus tore the ACL in his right knee Nov. 11 against Connecticut after recovering from back surgery. Smith said Romeus' back has been cleared by four doctors, and he hopes to work out for pro scouts in early April.
Romeus is one of six former Pitt players invited to the combine, joining running back Dion Lewis, receiver Jonathan Baldwin of Aliquippa, fullback Henry Hynoski, tackle Jason Pinkston (Baldwin) and defensive end Jabaal Sheard. West Virginia also will have six: running back Noel Devine, cornerback Brandon Hogan, nose tackle Chris Neild, receiver Jock Sanders, safety Robert Sands and linebacker J.T. Thomas.
Penn State running back Evan Royster and guard Stefen Wisniewski (Central Catholic), Slippery Rock center Brandon Fusco (Seneca Valley) and California (Pa.) quarterback Josh Portis also are slated to attend.
Rutgers adds another ex-Pitt coach
Rutgers hired former Pitt assistant Brian Angelichio as tight ends coach.
Coach Greg Schiano announced the hiring Thursday, the third time he has hired a former Pitt coach since Dave Wannstedt resigned in December. The Scarlet Knights also added Frank Cignetti as offensive coordinator and Jeff Hafley for a position to be announced.
Angelichio spent five seasons at Pitt, developing Nate Byham (San Francisco 49ers) and Dorin Dickerson (Houston Texans). He was the Panthers' offensive coordinator in last month's BBVA Compass Bowl.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.