ShareThis Page

Freeport grad relishes return to running

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Two months with no running had Nick Gentile feeling stir crazy. Taking away his running was like taking the tires off his car.

But the Robert Morris freshman followed doctor's orders and rested, and now he might be in the best competitive-running shape of his track career.

Gentile has recovered from a nagging lung ailment that hindered his senior track season at Freeport and slowed his transition to college cross country and track.

Gentile had a small tear in his lung -- known as spontaneous pericardium -- which forced him to miss the PIAA championships last May. But after sitting out for two months last summer, he returned to competitive running and is turning heads as he passes 800-meter runners this track season.

Gentile broke the RMU school 800 record in the indoor and outdoor seasons, the latter coming at the season-opening Wake Forest Open when he ran a time of 1:53.14.

Last weekend, he ran a 1:55.57 to win the Virginia Commonwealth Invitational.

"I am confident and feel like I have my stride back," Gentile said.

Gentile also has been running the anchor leg of the 1,600-meter relay for the Colonials.

Gentile's ailment did not require surgery, but doctors wanted to give the lung time to heal.

A biology/pre-med major, Gentile was advised by a cardiologist to take a month off, but RMU's medical staff prescribed two months.

"Nick's better traits are his work ethic, his loyalty to his coaches and his finishing kick," Robert Morris coach Michael Smith said. "He works very hard at what I ask him to do. If it is a long run -- not his specialty -- he will give his best effort every time."

The finishing kick is what impresses Smith most, and it played a key part in Gentile landing a Division I scholarship.

"Nick has a finishing kick that makes me smile from ear to ear," Smith said. "When it appears that he might be out of the race, he shifts gears and passes so many of is competitors. He seems to know exactly when he needs to go. It is a unique ability that he has."

Smith said he knew of Gentile's health issue, but that did not affect his scholarship offer, which already was on the table.

"I was surprised when I heard about the health problem, but I had already made the scholarship offer, so I stuck with it," Smith said. "We did have Nick see our team doctor in the summer, but it was not going to have any impact on his scholarship. I just wanted to know what he could and could not do as far as training goes."

Gentile will seek to finish near the top at the Northeast Conference Championships on May 7-8 in West Branch, N.J., and the IC4A East Coast Championships on May 14-15 in Princeton, N.J.

Gentile needs to run a time of 1:51.80 to get into the IC4A event.

"He does not need any extra expectations from me," Smith said. "Unfortunately the weather has been wreaking havoc on our season. I hope there will be some good-weather meets soon."

Gentile said he was allowed to ride an exercise bike lightly and actually lost weight during his time away from running.

"I wasn't running so I wasn't as hungry," he said. Gentile ran cross country for RMU starting in late August. The season served more of a tune-up purpose for track -- both indoor and outdoor.

"The hardest part was the endurance," Gentile said. "But it came back pretty quick. I feel like my leg strength is back to where it was."

There is another overcoming-adversity story to the school-record run. When Gentile first arrived at Wake Forest, he was walking around Kentner Stadium looking for some teammates when something flew into his eye.

To this day, he doesn't know what it was, but it caused a corneal abrasion. Gentile didn't find that out until a post-race hospital visit -- after he ran his record time.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.