Ohio State linebacker and former Gateway star Dorian Bell, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's 2008 Player of the Year, was suspended for next season due to an unspecified violation of team rules.
Ohio State coach Jim Tressel -- himself suspended for the first five games of next season -- confirmed Bell's suspension Sunday to The Columbus Dispatch, which cited sources that the suspension was in response to a third violation of same team rule.
Bell, a 6-foot-1, 225-pound redshirt sophomore, made nine tackles in limited action last season. He was expected to play more in 2011 after the Buckeyes lost starters Ross Homan and Brian Rolle off last year's team.
A five-star recruit while at Gateway, Bell was the third-ranked outside linebacker in the country by Rivals.com. As a senior, he recorded 113 tackles -- 75 solo and 19 for a loss -- made seven sacks, and defended nine passes. He also ran for 860 yards and 16 touchdowns.
The suspension continues a disappointing past few months for the Buckeyes.
In December, days before Ohio State faced Arkansas in the Sugar Bowl, five players -- including star quarterback and Jeannette native Terrelle Pryor -- were suspended by the NCAA the first five games of 2011 for receiving improper benefits.
Tressel was suspended when it was determined he was aware of his players' violations for nine months but didn't alert the NCAA or the school. Ohio State originally set his suspension at two games, but he requested it be extended to five games to match his players.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.