Travel woes hit Pitt football coach Graham
The coach flies coach, but not even a seat in first class would have saved Pitt's Todd Graham from this nightmare.
On the way home from his first trip to Big East Media Day, Graham, wife Penni and sons Dakota and Michael sat on an airplane in Providence, R.I., for more than three hours Tuesday night while maintenance workers replaced a latch.
Stuffed in the middle of a crowded aircraft, the Grahams were forced to wait so long that they missed their connecting flight in Philadelphia. That resulted in a night at an airport hotel and Graham showing up late for the coaches meeting he called for 6 a.m. Wednesday.
So, while Penni contacted USA Airways, checked the score of the Cubs/Pirates game and tweeted to her 836 followers, Todd spoke to his staff about what he wanted done in his absence the next day. With practice set to begin Monday, Graham was irritated about missing an important meeting but was a good sport about it.
"You have to learn to roll with the punches with this sort of thing," he said.
But when confronted with a long line at the security checkpoint in Philadelphia, he muttered, "The adventure continues."
Maybe his next contract should include a private plane for Pitt business, a luxury he enjoyed on occasion at Tulsa.
Graham said the trip reminded him of the Conference USA title game against Central Florida in 2005, when his flight from Tulsa to Orlando, Fla., was delayed eight hours.
"Woke up the next morning and beat 'em," he said with a smile.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.