QB Newsome transferring from Penn State
College Football Videos
Quarterback Kevin Newsome said he plans to transfer from Penn State and hopes to find a school where he can play immediately.
"I will be transferring as soon as possible," he said Thursday night. "But that's all I can say."
Newsome said he didn't know whether he will sit out the 2011 season.
"It depends on the school," he said.
Newsome, a 20-year-old junior from Portsmouth, Va., was third on the depth chart behind 2010 starters Rob Bolden and Matt McGloin, a former walk-on. Coach Joe Paterno, who opened practice with the team yesterday, has not named a starter. If Newsome leaves, Penn State's depth at quarterback will be seriously compromised because redshirt freshman Paul Jones (Sto-Rox) is wrestling with academic difficulties.
As a freshman in 2009, Newsome was the backup to All-Big Ten quarterback Daryll Clark, and he appeared in 10 games. But his playing time dropped as a sophomore: Newsome appeared in just six games, completing 6 of 13 passes for 78 yards for no touchdowns or interceptions.
Newsome came to Penn State as a four-star recruit and the No. 4 quarterback prospect in the country, according to rivals.com .
PSU No. 25 in coaches' poll
Penn State is ranked No. 25, and the Big East was blanked, in the USA Today coaches' preseason football poll , released Thursday.
The Nittany Lions, one of five Big Ten teams in the rankings, return 44 letter-winners, including 15 starters. The Big Ten, Big 12 (five) and SEC (eight) are the only conferences with more than two teams in the poll.
West Virginia received 149 voting points in the poll — putting the Mountaineers at No. 27 overall — and Pitt earned three points (No. 47).
Oklahoma is the preseason No. 1 team with 42 of 59 first-place votes. Alabama is second with 13 first-place votes. Oregon (two), LSU (two) and Florida State round out the top five.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.