ShareThis Page

Pitt coach Graham tries to keep things clean

| Thursday, Aug. 11, 2011

Pitt coach Todd Graham stopped practice Wednesday to admonish his players for using profanity.

"If I hear the F-word one more time, you are going to go to the sideline and run for the rest of practice," he said. "That doesn't do you any good. That doesn't speak well of your character."

After that, the harshest sound heard was the occasional train rumbling through the South Side.

In his first training camp, Graham has insisted on focus and discipline — even to the point of banning players from Twitter during camp.

» Sophomore linebacker Dan Mason, recovering from a right knee injury that put his career in jeopardy, burst through a hole in the backup offensive line to tackle freshman running back Cory Davis. The play earned Mason a high-five from defensive coordinator Keith Patterson, who immediately sent him to the sideline to protect the knee.

» Graham wasn't especially happy about practice Wednesday, the first day players wore shoulder pads. He called his team "a little sluggish, a little tentative," and graded the intensity at 80 percent. "That will get you about eight wins," he said. "We have to pick it up."

» Graham said starting receiver Devin Street needs to be more consistent.

"I challenged Devin," he said. "He can be one of the prolific (receivers) in the country, but you have to bring it every day. Our system is a timing system. If you don't run full speed on every route, it throws the timing off."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.