ShareThis Page

Illini transfer locks down H-back spot for Pitt

| Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2011

Pitt H-back Hubie Graham, a transfer from Illinois who sat out last season, is leading the pack at a position that coach Todd Graham calls "the most complicated in our offense."

The H-Back — or three-back as Todd Graham labels it — is a tight end who can run and catch without sacrificing his blocking.

"He has (to line up) in the backfield, (be) an inline (blocking) tight end," Todd Graham said. "He has to split out and has to be involved in the play-action game and protections."

Hubie Graham, who played with Penn State quarterback Matt McGloin at West Scranton High School, has shown an ability to get open in the middle of the defense. Backing up Graham is Sto-Rox graduate Drew Carswell, who catches everything with one hand because his injured left hand is wrapped in protective tape.

» The scrimmage no one outside the team was allowed to watch Sunday turned out to be a show for the defense.

"Defense, naturally, is a little bit farther ahead," Todd Graham said. "I thought they dominated the scrimmage."

The team's second scrimmage is Saturday.

» Punter Matt Yoklic of Pine-Richland had some 50-yard boomers, Todd Graham said.

» Ryan Turnley seems to have nailed down the center job, even after four bad snaps Sunday. While admitting the competition between Turnley and Chris Jacobson is ongoing, Todd Graham said Turnley "is basically the starting center, and Jacobson is the starting left guard."

» Wide receiver Cameron Saddler and cornerback K'Waun Williams didn't practice Monday after Todd Graham said they had a "little bell-rung deal" over the weekend. Wide receiver Devin Street had the same thing happen to him early in practice yesterday and didn't return.

» Tino Sunseri is one of 31 players on the preseason watch list for the Manning Award, given to the nation's top quarterback.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.