Hall of Famer Dorsett addresses Panthers
College Football Videos
Tony Dorsett wasn't kidding when he said he wants to reconnect with the Pitt football team.
The university's only Heisman Trophy winner visited the team's training complex on the South Side on Tuesday and addressed the team for 35 minutes. It was a rare appearance by Dorsett, who lives in Dallas and was invited to speak by coach Todd Graham.
Dorsett, 57, said he couldn't remember the most recent time he spoke to the Panthers, and by all accounts, he didn't waste the opportunity.
"Everyone was on the edge of their seats," wide receiver Cameron Saddler said.
"He told us about the sacrifices he made and how he planned for his goals," wide receiver Mike Shanahan said.
Dorsett summarized his message this way:
"Little things make great things happen," he said, "not just on the field, but in the classroom and in relationships."
Dorsett, who led Pitt to its most recent national title in 1976, also took questions from players and coaches.
"They asked me what motivated me and what kept me on track," he said. "I said it was that drive to be one of the best, if not the best, that intestinal fortitude to be the best. I also made sure I let them understand that I wanted to make my mother proud. Those things kept me on track and kept me focused.
"They are a good bunch of kids. I am hoping they are buying into the program and what coach Graham is trying to instill.
"I told them, 'If you get a little adversity, keep plugging away. Eventually, if you guys are pulling together and staying healthy, you have a chance to have success.' "
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Stop neighbors from stealing your Internet
- Penn State reports $33M in additional Sandusky settlements
- Steelers notebook: Linebacker Timmons hoping for contract extension
- 5 injured in Route 51 crash in Rostraver
- Chief justice revokes Feudale’s senior judge status
- Penguins 4th line is showing promise
- Pittsburgh police deliver 2,500 Thanksgiving meals through program
- 5 hospitalized when family’s SUV runs off Route 51 in Rostraver
- Steelers plan to use smart pass rush against Seattle QB Wilson
- Police arrest man in Homestead bank robbery
- School lunch group hopes to revise rules it calls impractical, too restrictive