Pitt mum about Big 12 speculation
College Football Videos
Pitt athletic department officials Sunday declined to defuse speculation that the Panthers could join the Big 12.
"Rampant speculation on conference expansion occurs, and changes, on a daily basis," senior associate athletic director E.J. Borghetti wrote in an email to the Tribune-Review. "It would not be productive or responsible to add to that speculation by commenting."
Big 12 officials expect Texas A&M to announce this week that it plans to leave the conference. Texas A&M has expressed interest in joining the SEC.
During a conference call Saturday, Big 12 university presidents discussed possible replacements if A&M leaves, which would reduce the conference to nine teams, the New York Times reported. Pitt, Notre Dame, Arkansas and Brigham Young were mentioned, according to the report.
It seems unlikely that Pitt -- which is four states away from the nearest Big 12 school, Missouri -- would join the conference. Although considered the weakest -- and therefore most vulnerable for raiding -- of the six BCS football conferences, the Big East has a commitment from TCU to join the conference next season.
TCU, which plays in the Mountain West, finished the past two regular seasons undefeated. It lost to Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl after the 2009 season and defeated Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl last season. The Horned Frogs are No. 14 in the Associated Press preseason poll.
Pitt was picked to finish second in the Big East behind No. 24 West Virginia in the preseason media poll.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.