Pitt coach rewards backup with scholarship
Pitt backup quarterback Trey Anderson is no longer a walk-on.
Coach Todd Graham on Thursday said Anderson, a freshman from Pearland, Texas, was given a scholarship this week. The coach may reward another walk-on before Saturday's opener against Buffalo.
Anderson, who almost went to Tyler (Texas) Junior College, has fared well in camp and will be the first quarterback off the bench Saturday. Graham said he considers walk-ons an important part of his program.
"One of the big things we want to do is build our walk-on program," he said. "At Tulsa, every year, we gave two scholarships to walk-ons."
» Graham talks repeatedly about meeting boosters at dinners and other functions. He finds time for such things after practice because he gets to work by 5 a.m. Nonetheless, he loves speaking to crowds or merely chatting with people one-on-one, and his message is always the same: Pitt won't run from expectations.
One booster told him, "Coach, you may have to win 11 or 12 games to satisfy the fans." His response: "Good." Another said, "Coach, you are really putting yourself out there." Replied Graham: "So what• I knew that when I took the job."
» The only player from the two-deep depth chart who may not play Saturday because of injury is wide receiver Ed Tinker (undisclosed). Graham said linebacker Dan Mason (knee) is several weeks away from even thinking about playing.
» Pitt officials said season-ticket sales are ahead of last year's total of 49,000. That should translate into a crowd well in excess of 50,000 on Saturday.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.