ACC accepts Pitt and Syracuse
College Football Videos
Pitt and Syracuse officially became the 13th and 14th members of the Atlantic Coast Conference today and Chancellor Mark A. Nordenberg said on a morning conference call that the move should not have been a surprise to the jilted Big East.
Nordenberg said he warned Big East Commissioner John Marinatto in writing in May, 2010, that the university would "seriously assess" other opportunities.
"Any university leader involved in intercollegiate athletics really has two fundamental responsibilities," Nordenberg said. "One is to work to build strength in a current conference home, which we at the University of Pittsburgh always have done in the Big East.
"Second is to be appropriately attentive to the changing landscape and institutional opportunities that might need to be pursued. We also have been attentive to that responsibility
"We also made very clear if other opportunities did arise we would feel as if we were obligated to seriously access them."
Nordenberg said the conference response was that other Big East schools were making similar plans.
On other matters, ACC Commissioner John Swofford said including Madison Square Garden in a rotation for a basketball tournament venue was "very appealing" to the conference.
Also, although Big East by-laws mandate a 27-months notice before an institution can leave the conference, Nordenberg said it could be modified.
"I would think in the weeks ahead everyone will be looking at the transition period and trying to determine whether that 27-months notice really serves everyone's best interests and whether there would be a modification to it.
"But our starting point is the Big East bylaws. The ACC would be comfortable with waiting that period of time if that, indeed, is how things unfold."
Pitt and Syracuse must pay a $5 million exit fee to the Big East.
ACC Commissioner John Swofford said the conference's broadcast contract with ESPN can be contractually modified with the additions of the two schools.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.