ShareThis Page

West Virginia's Big East title hopes take damaging blow

| Sunday, Nov. 6, 2011

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. -- West Virginia's problems on special teams finally proved to be its downfall and made the Mountaineers' road to a Big East championship that much harder.

Louisville's Andrew Johnson returned a blocked field goal for an 82-yard touchdown to spark the Cardinals' upset of No. 24 West Virginia, 38-35, on Saturday afternoon at Milan Puskar Stadium.

"This one wasn't very hard to figure out," West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen said. "You lose the turnover battle, you go 0-2 on field goals - that gets you beat."

Kicker Tyler Bitancurt, who had already pulled a 32-yard attempt wide left in the third quarter, lined up for a 23-yard try on the fourth quarter's first play.

Louisville's Adrian Bushell came over the right side of the West Virginia line to block the kick. The ball bounced into Johnson's hands, and he took off down the right sideline to the dismay of the 57,287 in attendance. Johnson's touchdown gave the Cardinals a 31-21 lead.

It was the first blocked field goal returned for a touchdown against West Virginia since Virginia Tech's Vincent Fuller took one 74 yards in 2004.

"You march all the way down the field and get one blocked for a touchdown -- that's a 10-point swing," Holgorsen said. "If you look at the score, that means something. If that wouldn't have happened, we would have gotten the points, moved on, and we'd probably be pretty happy right now."

Down 24-21, West Virginia (6-3, 2-2) drove 73 yards to the Louisville 6. On third-and-2, quarterback Geno Smith's pass to Stedman Bailey fell incomplete in the end zone, which led to the blocked kick.

Holgorsen said it was a run-pass option and that Smith should have handed off.

"They gave us the look we wanted on the outside," Smith said. "It was one-on-one. I think the defensive back had good leverage.

"Maybe I should have handed it off. They had a couple guys in the box, but I should have trusted it, handed it off and see where it would have got us."

West Virginia tried to get back in the game on its next drive, but turned the ball over. Smith tried to set up a screen, but the ball slipped out of his hands.

After a Louisville three-and-out, Smith got another chance. He engineered an eight-play, 96-yard touchdown drive to pull WVU within three.

Shawne Alston capped the drive with a 7-yard touchdown, running over a defender and his own offensive lineman, Tyler Rader, in the process.

On the next drive, Louisville (5-4, 3-1) faced a fourth-and-1 on the West Virginia 43 with 5:13 left in the fourth quarter. Cardinals running back Dominique Brown went right and appeared to be stopped short of the marker, but he spun off a defender for 2 yards and a fresh set of downs.

It was the same play the Cardinals used in the first quarter that sprung Brown for a 55-yard run to set up Louisville's first touchdown.

"I saw the running back's feet stop, and I figured we had it," defensive tackle Julian Miller said. "Next thing you know, I get up out of the pile, look up and they're spotting the ball a couple inches past the first down."

Brown capped the drive with a 3-yard touchdown, putting the Cardinals up 10 with 1:50 left in the fourth quarter. The drive covered 66 yards and took 7:03 off the clock.

After West Virginia scored to pull within three once more, Brown recovered the onside kick to seal the win.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.