Champs Sports Bowl checks out matchup
Rich Bradley, a Penn Hills High School graduate, represented the Champs Sports Bowl on Saturday night at Heinz Field for Pitt's game against No. 23 Cincinnati.
The bowl, set for Dec. 29 in Orlando, Fla., will match a Big East school against an ACC team after the BCS bowls make their selections. The bowl is not required to choose the conference runner-up, and the total payout for both teams is $4.25 million.
Bradley runs a marketing company in Orlando and works part-time for the bowl committee. He also was a freelance sports reporter for several publications in the 1980s.
Bradley said the bowl is looking for the best matchup -- "two teams that have done well and will give us a nice, competitive game," he said.
N.C. State beat West Virginia, 23-7, in last year's matchup. Pitt played in the bowl in 2001 -- when it was known as the Tangerine Bowl -- beating N.C. State, 34-19, behind MVP Antonio Bryant.
Running back Ray Graham, out for the season with a knee injury, led the Panthers out of the tunnel before the game while hobbling on his crutches. ... Senior Lucas Nix missed his fourth consecutive game (minus two plays) with a nagging left knee injury. He was replaced at left guard by Aliquippa graduate Juantez Hollins. ... Wide receiver Mike Shanahan replaced Cam Saddler (out for the season with a fractured sternum) as the No. 1 punt returner, but he didn't try to catch either of Cincinnati's first two punts. ... Aaron Donald made his first start at defensive end when Pitt opened in a four-man front, joining Chas Alecxih, Myles Caragein and Brandon Lindsey.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.