ShareThis Page

WVU coach Holgorsen targets offensive line

| Thursday, Nov. 17, 2011

MORGANTOWN, W.VA. — West Virginia coach Dana Holgorsen didn't dance around the offensive line's performance in last weekend's narrow win at Cincinnati.

"None of them played good enough to win," he said. "We'll leave it at that."

During this week's bye, the West Virginia offensive line needs to improve after some shaky performances in the past few games, Holgorsen said. The coaches are challenging the linemen to play better, but the unit's taking it a step further.

"We're challenging ourselves," senior right guard Tyler Rader said. "All of us were sick of the way we played. It was awful. We can't let that happen."

The problems began against Syracuse on Oct. 21, when the offensive line allowed four sacks against a number of exotic blitz packages. Cincinnati didn't blitz much Saturday, but West Virginia still allowed a season-high five sacks.

The offensive line allowed just five sacks in five nonconference games, including none against current-No. 1 LSU. But since starting Big East play, the Mountaineers have given up 16 sacks in five conference games.

The Cincinnati game might have been the line's worst performance. Holgorsen said the Mountaineers had opportunities to run but were limited to a season-low 32 yards on 32 carries.

The running backs combined for 24 carries and 46 yards — just 1.9 yards per rush. Junior running back Shawne Alston doesn't like to single out his offensive line but admitted there's been frustration for the country's 97th-ranked rushing attack.

"There's a lot of frustration," Alston said, "being whether it's offensive line problems, running back problems or just being that we played a good defense."

The offensive line committed five of the West Virginia's season-high 14 penalties against Cincinnati, and another holding call was declined.

"I don't make excuses," said Rader, who was guilty of a false start against Cincinnati. "I really don't know what it is. If we knew, we'd be able to fix it."

West Virginia at least has had consistency up front. It's one of three Big East teams that has employed the same offensive line in every game this season

It hasn't mattered lately, as the unit struggles to effectively run block and win one-on-one battles in pass protection.

"Have we called them out• Yes, we're challenging them," Holgorsen said. "We want them to get better. We're going to work hard with them and get them healed up."

A bye week couldn't come at a better time. The line will use the time off to get refocused and improve in time for the Backyard Brawl against Pitt on Nov. 25.

"We have to improve, no question. Up front is where it has to start," Rader said. "I think we've been playing the worst that we've played all year in the last couple games, and that can't happen."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.