Pitt coach Todd Graham's take
Pitt coach Todd Graham weighs in on his team's game this week against West Virginia:
Is it a challenge going up against another no-huddle team, such as West Virginia?
"The no-huddle is something we are used to. There's a reason why we run it; we think it's pretty effective. So, obviously, that is a challenge. But I think the bigger challenge is how talented (WVU quarterback Geno Smith) is as a passer. Geno has a tremendous rapport with his receivers, especially (Stedman) Bailey and (Tavon) Austin. He knows where they are going to be, and they have a great timing among each other. They are two of the better receivers in the country. The thing we have to do is try to keep them off-balance and try to impact the quarterback without giving up cheap, big plays."
Is there familiarity (between Pitt and West Virginia) after having competed against coach Dana Holgorsen while you were at Tulsa and he was at Houston and Oklahoma State?
"I think there is familiarity on both sides of the ball. I can tell you that he is very adaptive as we are. If you look at what he's doing, it's not exactly what he did at Oklahoma State or at Houston, and what he did at Oklahoma State is different than what he did at Houston. But the core principles of the scheme stay the same."
Is quarterback Tino Sunseri coming off a game (the victory over Louisville) where he was at his most decisive?
"I think so. He really did a good job, making good decisions. He took care of the football, 100 percent ball security from his standpoint. There is no substitute for experience in this system, and I think he's playing his best football right now. With their defense and how they can attack and how they can run, it's going to be very important that he just manages the game. Don't put the ball in jeopardy."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.