Pitt coach thinks OL Nix will be OK for WVU
College Football Videos
Pitt senior right guard Lucas Nix hasn't played since hurting his knee in the second play of the South Florida game Sept. 29, but coach Todd Graham almost sounds hopeful that Nix will return Friday at West Virginia.
"We anticipate that Lucas will play," Graham said. "I don't want to tell you he is definitely going to and then he doesn't, and you guys (reporters) think I'm not telling you the truth."
A ligament that provides support for his left kneecap was stretched, and Nix has been careful not to re-injure it during his rehabilitation.
"Obviously, he has the best chance to play this week; he has had the most time to get ready," said Graham, noting that Pitt didn't play last week. "I anticipate and expect him to be playing."
Pitt used its seventh different five-man combination on the offensive line against Louisville, with Cory King starting at right guard for Ryan Schlieper, who moved to left guard.
> > Center Ryan Turnley hasn't practiced for the past month while dealing with plantar fasciitis in both feet, but he is the only Pitt offensive lineman to start every game at one position. Senior Jordan Gibbs has started every game — nine at right tackle and one at left tackle. Turnley said the situation on the line keeps everyone alert.
"Everyone has to continue to step up and do their job because you don't have a set five," he said. "If you're not playing well, you're not going to play."
> > Pitt received a verbal commitment from cornerback Jahmahl Pardner of Aquinas Institute in Rochester, N.Y. Pardner (6-foot-1, 179 pounds) is Pitt's 19th commitment from the Class of 2012. Pardner said he chose Pitt over offers from Georgia Tech and Temple.
"He reminds you to be a good person outside of football," Pardner said of Graham. "He doesn't treat you as just a football player."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.