ShareThis Page

Graham's defection rankles former Clairton star

| Thursday, Dec. 15, 2011

Like the other members of the Pitt football team, former Clairton star Kevin Weatherspoon believed every word smooth-talking coach Todd Graham said when he was hired in January.

And like every other Pitt player, Weatherspoon feels betrayed today.

The news broke Wednesday that Graham — without the courtesy of a face-to-face meeting, or even direct contact — had left Pitt to take the same position at Arizona State.

"We're supposed to be a family," Weatherspoon said. "It was about us sticking together, about no one leaving us. All that was said, none of it was true. He left us in the dust."

In a conversation with The Daily News in January, Weatherspoon spoke highly of Graham, his optimistic style and his "high-octane" boasts.

Over the course of the past 11 months, however, Weatherspoon's mood soured.

"It was supposed to be so exciting, high-octane," Weatherspoon said. "Then you saw how it really was. As the season went along, not only me but my team, everything about him (Graham) just seemed iffy. It wasn't the same as when he took over."

Graham rubbed many the wrong way with his tendency to criticize players, especially quarterback Tino Sunseri. Weatherspoon said that, while he never had a personal problem with the coach, Graham didn't always live up to his word.

"There were people (on the team) who were buying in to everything he said," Weatherspoon said. "Promises were made. It hurts us. A lot of us really believed in him. We won't put him down now, but it hurts a lot of us."

Weatherspoon, a redshirt freshman this season, dressed for games but saw essentially no playing time.

"I was very frustrated," he said. "If I knew I shouldn't have been out there, I wouldn't have been so frustrated. I felt like I could have been out there a lot more than I was."

The next Pitt coach will be the fourth Weatherspoon has been played for in two years. He was recruited by former Dave Wannstedt two years ago, and the two had a close relationship. Weatherspoon and the Panthers survived through the drama involving the hiring and immediate firing of Pitt coach Mike Haywood, and now feel nearly overwhelmed by the latest news.

"The good thing is that we really are a team," Weatherspoon said. "We're going to stick together no matter what. We know that college and coaching is a business. Coaches come and go, I guess. But we're here to go to school and to play football, no matter who are coach is. And that's what we're going to do. Everything is supposed to happen for a reason, and we're sticking to that."

Weatherspoon will have the pleasure of a diversion on Friday. While everyone else's attention will be on the search for a new coach later this week, Weatherspoon's heart will be in Hershey.

Clairton will be playing for a third straight PIAA Class A championship. Weatherspoon was a star on Clairton's first state title team in 2009, and he can always find some peace while watching the Bears, even during such a tumultuous time.

"I know we have practice on Friday," Weatherspoon said. "But somehow, I'll find a TV."

And someway, Weatherspoon said, the Pitt football team will stick together.

"No doubt," Weatherspoon said. "It's been a tough day for everyone. But we'll be OK."

Additional Information:

Another perspective

Check out the Arizona Republic's coverage on Todd Graham's hiring at Arizona State.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.