ShareThis Page

Hopewell star unhappy with start

Chris Harlan
| Friday, Oct. 8, 2010

Hopewell's Rushel Shell has been hurdling names on the WPIAL's all-time rushing list two at a time, moving closer to a record that seems within his reach.

But he's not having much fun.

That's because while he streaks toward the top of that rushing list, his team has been stumbling toward the bottom of the Parkway Conference standings.

Hopewell is tied for last.

"It's been frustrating," said Shell, a highly recruited running back. "Sometimes, you want to put your head down."

Never did Shell imagine he would be playing for his playoff life in Week 6 of his junior season.

A year ago, Hopewell was unbeaten in the regular season and the WPIAL runner-up in Class AAA. But one more loss almost certainly would leave the Vikings (1-4, 0-3) home come November.

"It's basically do or die," Shell said of tonight's game at New Castle.

A 6-foot, 220-pounder, Shell has rushed for 1,011 yards and eight touchdowns in 2010 — the beginning of what should be another outstanding statistical season for last year's WPIAL leading rusher. In his varsity career, Shell has 5,265 yards.

Last week, against Blackhawk, Shell rushed for 128 yards — his 23rd consecutive game with at least 100 yards. He leapt two spots on the WPIAL's all-time rushing list and moved closer to all-time rusher Mike Vernillo of Fort Cherry (7,646 yards).

"He's a scary back," said Blackhawk coach Joe Hamilton, who spoke to Shell after last Friday's game. "I told him: 'Son, you know, I didn't get any sleep this week just thinking about you running that stupid ball.' "

In the third quarter, a 4-yard run moved Shell past Duquesne High School's Todd Harris (5,224 yards) and into eighth place.

In the fourth, a 13-yard run moved Shell past Greensburg Central Catholic's Max Suter (5,252 yards) and into seventh place.

Still, Hopewell lost, 31-14.

"As of right now, all the record stuff isn't a big deal to me," Shell said, "because we're losing."

With only two starters back from 2009, Shell knew this wouldn't be a continuation of last season, when he rushed for a WPIAL-best 2,740 yards, and his team sprinted unblemished into Heinz Field.

"I knew coming into the season it wasn't going to be another perfect season like last year," Shell said. "We weren't just going to come in and dominate everyone."

But he expected better than 0-3 at this point in conference play.

With a young offense around Shell, opposing defenses have placed even more focus on him. Shell said one or two defenders shadow him every play.

Still, he has scored 11 times.

To reach the WPIAL playoffs, Hopewell likely will need to defeat its final four Parkway opponents: New Castle (1-2), Central Valley (2-1), Ambridge (0-3) and West Allegheny (3-0).

Shell believes that's possible.

"This is the time to be a leader," Shell said. "I have to step up and show everybody that even though we're losing, we can turn things around."

Additional Information:

WPIAL career rushing leaders

1. Mike Vernillo, Fort Cherry (thru 1999): 7,646

2. Matt Gavrish, Penn-Trafford (thru 1997): 6,512

3. Rodney Wilson, West Greene (thru 1993): 6,304

4. Jason Barr, McGuffey (thru 1993): 5,749

5. Chico Williams, Aliquippa (thru 1992): 5,417

6. Darrell Harding, Charleroi (thru 1991): 5,410

7. Rushel Shell, Hopewell (still active) : 5,265

8. Max Suter, Greensburg Central Catholic (thru 2006): 5,252

9. Todd Harris, Duquesne HS (thru 2001): 5,224

10. Keith Miller, Beth-Center (thru 1994): 5,121

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.