ShareThis Page

Behind running game, Mt. Lebanon rolls

| Saturday, Oct. 16, 2010

Luke Hagy has had a number of outstanding games for Mt. Lebanon this season but none quite like he had Friday night.

The junior running back ran 28 times for 317 yards and two touchdowns, as the Class AAAA No. 3 Blue Devils defeated Bethel Park, 21-7, at Mt. Lebanon Stadium.

"It shows that our line is playing great this year," Hagy said. "I'm finding the holes, and it's working out so far."

Hagy scored from 71 yards on the first play from scrimmage, then added an 89-yarder in the third quarter. The junior has rushed for 1,265 yards and 18 touchdowns this season.

He also contributed in the passing game yesterday. On fourth-and-8 with 10:34 left in the second, he picked up a heavy blitz from the outside. That gave quarterback Pat Goff time to find Paul Lang in the end zone for a 29-yard score that gave the Blue Devils (7-0, 3-0) a 14-7 lead.

Bethel Park star Bre' Ford had 183 rushing yards and a touchdown on 23 carries, but a costly fumble changed the momentum. Down, 14-7, Bethel Park (3-4, 1-2) drove to the Mt. Lebanon 5-yard line to open the second half. On first-and-goal, Ford was hit by Paul Lang, knocking the ball loose. Tim Cwalina recovered the fumble for Mt. Lebanon.

"We made some key mistakes, and that's hard to swallow," Bethel Park coach Jeff Metheny said.

Two plays later, Hagy ran for a 89-yard touchdown to put Mt. Lebanon up, 21-7.

Ford ran 54 yards for a touchdown that tied the score, 7-7, in the first quarter. After trading possessions, the Blackhawks appeared to have Mt. Lebanon stopped. However, a Blue Devils punt bounced off Shakeil Carter, who was blocking a gunner.

Mt. Lebanon's John McCarty recovered, leading to the Lang touchdown catch that put the Blue Devils up for good.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.