Burrell finds its girls hoops coach
Meghan Ziemianski, who guided Highlands' girls basketball team to four consecutive trips to the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs, was hired Tuesday as coach of the Class AA Burrell girls squad.
Ziemianski, a Burrell graduate, stepped down as coach at Highlands after the 2010-11 season.
She was approved by an 8-0 vote and received a one-year contract for $5,024 from Burrell last night.
Last season, Ziemianski coached Highlands to records of 5-15 overall and 2-8 in Section 1-AAA. The Golden Rams finished in a three-way tie for fourth place and barely kept alive their streak of four consecutive trips to the postseason.
Before Ziemianski's first season at Highlands, the Golden Rams' previous trip to the playoffs was in 1975.
Last season, Burrell ended up 7-15 overall and 6-8 in Section 1-AA and missed the playoffs for the second consecutive year. Ziemianski takes over for Brian Sharick, who left after three seasons.
Meghan's father, Mark, coached the Burrell girls and boys varsity teams at various times in the past.
One day before Ziemianski was hired at Burrell, the Golden Rams replaced her with Ron Lang, who's a school board member at Highlands. Lang was approved as a volunteer coach and won't be paid.
Neither Ziemianski or Lang could be reached for comment.
In other coach news, Burrell hired Michael Larko as girls volleyball coach, pending the usual clearances. He will receive a one-year, $2,191 contract.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.