ShareThis Page

Mt. Lebo girls soccer struggling offensively

| Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2011

Two veteran defenders and one of the WPIAL's top goalkeepers have helped the Mt. Lebanon girls soccer team win games by relying on its defense.

But if the top-ranked Blue Devils plan on easing the sting of last year's abrupt playoff exit, second-year coach Aaron Panczyk knows his team will have to figure out how to consistently generate offense.

"We defend well, but we lack desperation when it comes to scoring goals," Panczyk said. "That's something that we need to remedy if we're going to be where we want to be at the end."

Mt. Lebanon's defense has pitched shutouts in 23 of its past 27 games, including all eight this season. Yet in half of those games, the Blue Devils (8-0, 4-0 Section 4-AAA) scored only once.

"We almost have the puzzle solved," said senior defender Johanna Platt, a High Point (N.C.) recruit who, along with fellow defender Kate Touscany and goalkeeper Emma Pellicano anchor the team's back line.

"We're connecting, and we're getting a lot of crosses. Being desperate in the box has been our main problem, just doing anything to get a goal."

Mt. Lebanon has historically been one of the WPIAL's top programs, winning Class AAA titles in 1983, '84, '86, '93, 2000 and '08, when the Blue Devils allowed just nine goals in 23 games.

But after winning nine straight down the stretch last fall to split the Section 4-AAA title with eventual WPIAL and PIAA Class AAA champion Peters Township, the Blue Devils were bounced by Hampton in the WPIAL quarterfinals, 1-0.

Mt. Lebanon opened this season with a win over Penn-Trafford and followed that by downing PIAA Class AA champion Mercyhurst Prep. Six days later, Mt. Lebanon won at 2010 Class AAA runner-up Norwin. All three games, not so surprisingly, finished 1-0.

Junior forward Lucy Nass and senior midfielder Katharine Pryor lead the team with four goals apiece. Junior midfielder Alex Ventrone has three, creating a tie for second with one of the team's two younger defenders, sophomore Maddie Collins.

"We're struggling to find goal scorers," said Panczyk, who was the Seton-La Salle boys soccer coach from 2002-08, winning three WPIAL and two PIAA Class A titles. "I know that sounds odd, considering we're undefeated and haven't had a goal scored on us, but we're not playing with the type of passion that we need to be playing with when you talk about playing into November and deep into the WPIAL and state playoffs."

Pellicano insists she knows Mt. Lebanon can score.

"We need to have more confidence in ourselves," Pellicano said. "We shoot perfectly fine in practice, and our offensive players have good shots. We just need to figure out how to shoot in a game."

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review soccer rankings


(records through Monday's games)

Class AAA

Team — Record

1. Peters Township — 5-1-0

2. Mt. Lebanon — 5-1-1

3. Central Catholic — 8-1-0

4. Bethel Park — 5-2-0

5. Seneca Valley — 5-2-0

Dropped out: No. 3 Pine-Richland (1-2-3), No. 5 Upper St. Clair (2-1-2)

Class AA

1. Hampton — 6-1-0

2. Beaver — 6-0-0

3. Mars — 4-2-1

4. West Allegheny — 5-0-1

5. Quaker Valley — 5-1-0

Class A

1. Sewickley Academy — 3-1-0

2. Seton-La Salle — 5-1-0

3. Neshannock — 7-0-0

4. Greensburg Central Catholic — 4-1-0

5. Mohawk — 4-0-0


Class AAA

Team — Record

1. Mt. Lebanon — 8-0-0

2. Peters Township — 5-1-1

3. Penn-Trafford — 5-1-0

4. Norwin — 4-2-0

5. Seneca Valley — 6-1-0

Class AA

1. Mars — 8-0-0

2. South Park — 5-0-1

3. Central Valley — 5-1-0

4. Mt. Pleasant — 5-2-0

5. Knoch — 7-0-0

Dropped out: No. 3 Deer Lakes (4-3-0), No. 5 Beaver (2-4-0)

Class A

1. Greensburg Central Catholic — 8-0-0

2. Shady Side Academy — 4-2-0

3. Avonworth — 7-1-0

4. Vincentian Academy — 4-1-0

5. Sewickley Academy — 4-2-0

Dropped out: No. 3 Springdale (3-3-1), No. 4 Seton-La Salle (4-2-0)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.