ShareThis Page

Blackhawk sophomore QB Kincade commits to Pitt

Jerry DiPaola
| Wednesday, Nov. 9, 2011

Blackhawk sophomore quarterback Chandler Kincade was watching Pitt practice one day in August when coach Todd Graham approached with an unexpected gift — a scholarship.

Kincade was surprised and flattered, but he decided to wait until after the season to accept. Finally, Blackhawk coach Joe Hamilton called Graham on Wednesday morning, handed the telephone to Kincade, who said he plans to enroll at Pitt in 2014.

"After they offered me, I had a pretty good idea I wanted to commit," Kincade said. "I just wanted to wait until after the season. The coaches are great guys and the program seems like it is progressing each week."

Kincade, 6-foot-5, 218 pounds, missed part of Blackhawk's season with a shoulder injury, but he completed 40 of 68 passes for 547 yards and three touchdowns in five games. Hamilton said Kincade is athletic enough to run, but that wasn't part of Blackhawk's offensive game plan.

"We didn't allow him to run very much," Hamilton said. "We only had one quarterback."

"I've never been a running quarterback," Kincade said. "I've always been a passing quarterback, but I can run."

Kincade said he chose Pitt partially because his brother, Anthony, who doesn't play football, may enroll there after he graduates from Blackhawk next year.

"It means a lot to be with him," Kincade said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.