VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- Defenseman Mike Weber, a native of Cranberry and a former Penguins Junior B team player, was drafted by the Buffalo Sabres in the second round (57th overall) of the NHL Entry Draft on Saturday.
"I grew up in Pittsburgh and played all my minor hockey there, basically," said Weber, who left Cranberry at 15 years old to go play for the Windsor Spitfires of the Ontario Hockey League. "I played my last year there with the Pittsburgh Junior B organization, and they were great. They were the ones who helped me out and got me seen and scouted and everything like that to go play in the OHL. They are a big part of where I am right now."
Weber, 6-foot-2 and 199 pounds, was ranked 34th overall among North American skaters by the NHL's Central Scouting Bureau. The scouting agency called him a solid skater with good balance who moves the puck well on outlet passes, an effective power-play contributor and a solid positional player who is difficult to beat one-on-one and reads the play well.
He had five goals and 21 assists in 68 games with the Spitfires last year.
Weber's mother, Sheri Rossi, and father, Rich Weber, still live in the area.
He is one of a number of Pittsburgh natives to be drafted in recent years, including Philadelphia Flyers forward R.J. Umberger and Penguins forward Ryan Malone.
"When (Umberger) got drafted (16th overall in 2001), it kind of opened the door, and I said 'Hey, maybe people are watching Pittsburgh,' " Weber said. "The city of Pittsburgh, every time I go back, hockey's getting bigger and bigger, and it's great to see."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.