ShareThis Page

Jagr sues former accountant

| Saturday, Aug. 12, 2006

Jaromir Jagr considers his former accountant the Six Million Dollar Man.

The former Penguins star sued Richland accountant Gary Schick on Tuesday, demanding he turn over a tax form that was supposed to be filed with the IRS in 2003. The lawsuit, filed in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, claims that if Jagr does not get the form, it will cost him $6 million.

"Whatever I had, I turned over to his attorney or his new accountant," said Schick, of Harmony, Butler County. "I don't know what I can fight here. I turned it all over."

Jagr's attorney, James A. Marchewka, of Canonsburg, Washington County, insisted that Schick has refused for two years to turn over the paperwork, which concerns the hockey player's stock trading.

"This was a last resort, since Mr. Schick has not returned our calls or responded to written correspondence," said Marchewka, who said Schick once claimed that the form was "lost in a flood."

Jagr has had previous tax problems. According to court records, the Internal Revenue Service filed tax liens against Jagr totalling more than $35,000 in 2002, $3.2 million in 2003 and $1.4 million in 2004. All of the liens have been satisfied, court records state.

Marchewka said Jagr, who left the Penguins in 2001 and now plays for the New York Rangers, would not comment.

Jagr, who maintains a home in Upper St. Clair, is appealing his 2003 tax return to the IRS, according to the lawsuit. Schick said he prepared that tax return.

The lawsuit states Jagr needs a copy of a tax form titled "Election to be traded as an occupational trader" for his appeal.

Schick said he filed the form, which he said declared Jagr as an "occupational trader" and allowed him to deduct all of his stock losses, instead of the normal $3,000 maximum for taxpayers.

Although Schick said he filed the form with the IRS, he said he did not deduct all of the stock losses on Jagr's tax return that year.

"As far as I was concerned, he was a hockey player," Schick said. "In my opinion, he's not an occupational trader, but I guess his new accountant feels he is."

The IRS does not have a copy of the form, the lawsuit states.

Schick said he remembers Jagr losing some money on stock trading that year, "but not $6 million."

Marchewka declined to discuss Jagr's tax appeal or how his client could lose that much money.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.