Arena negotiations to resume next week
Gov. Ed Rendell and Penguins co-owner Ronald Burkle resumed their arena negotiations late Tuesday by talking over the phone, Rendell said this morning.
The two men agreed to talk again next week and could meet in person, Rendell said. He spoke after appearing at an Oakland event related to his health care reform proposal.
Rendell said the conversation with Burkle went well, adding that he does not think public officials will have to resort to asking the National Hockey League to block the Penguins from moving to a new hometown. Rendell said yesterday that he would go to the league -- if necessary -- to keep the team in Pittsburgh.
Burkle and Rendell have met in Pittsburgh two times to talk about how to pay for a new Uptown arena. The most recent meeting broke off last Thursday over issues related to development rights for the Mellon Arena site and the sharing of parking revenues for a new arena.
Separately, the Penguins are not expected to visit Houston today. Officials in that city said they had been approached by Penguins officials about a possible visit.
Team co-owner Mario Lemieux is in Dallas for today's NHL All-Star Game. Top league officials have made it clear they hope to find a way of keeping the Penguins in Pittsburgh.
"The league unanimously wants to see Pittsburgh stay exactly where it is and I think that we'll explore every possible avenue to make that happen," said Lou Lamoriello, General Manager of the New Jersey Devils.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.