Pens' Laraque ready to play
Georges Laraque declared himself "100 percent" after the Penguins' practice Thursday. He had missed two games because of back spasms. Since the Penguins won both games, knocking off the Eastern Conference's two best teams, and coach Michel Therrien generally doesn't like to change his lineup after a win, Laraque said he didn't know if he'd play tonight against the Montreal Canadiens.
"I'd be OK to wait," Laraque said. "I'm a team guy. Whatever it takes to win."
Most of the Penguins players were told to stay off the ice yesterday after back-to-back wins over the Buffalo Sabres and New Jersey Devils. Those who participated were Laraque, Mark Eaton, Joel Kwiatkowski, Chris Thorburn, Ronald Petrovicky, Nils Ekman and goaltenders Jocelyn Thibault and Marc-Andre Fleury.
Eaton skated for the second time after spraining his knee March 1. There is no timetable for his return.
"It felt better (yesterday) than it did (Wednesday), so hopefully that trend continues and I can just get my strength back and hopefully in the next couple of days get a session out there that's pain-free," Eaton said. "It's two weeks (yesterday) and when it happened they said 2-4 weeks, so it's right on schedule."
Quotable: "We want to make sure we're well-prepared for the playoffs. It's important for us to play solid hockey. I'm very optimistic about the way we are capable to play against the No. 1 team in our conference and the second team in our conference, and the way we played. Sometimes you can pick up wins and not be that satisfied with the way you're playing. But I really liked the way we played those two games." - Coach Michel Therrien, on the team's last two wins.
59 - Points for defenseman Sergei Gonchar in 70 games this season.
67 - Gonchar's career high in points, set in 2002-03.
- By Karen Price
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.