Penguins aim for more goals
The Penguins could take comfort in knowing they were one of only 12 teams to average at least three goals per game as of Friday.
They could, but they should not.
Officially the Penguins have amassed 27 goals over nine games entering tonight's game with Montreal at 7:30 at Mellon Arena.
Take away a goal credited to them for winning a shootout against Carolina on Oct. 19, and the Penguins have averaged only 2.89 goals per game -- and just two over the past four contests.
Considering they averaged 3.38 goals per game last season, third-best in the league, the Penguins' recent offensive struggles could suggest ...
"Nothing really," right wing Petr Sykora said. "Everybody is trying to figure out why we are not scoring goals. I do not think we should panic about it.
"Every team goes through stretches in a season when (it) struggles to score. It could happen through Games 40 and 50 and nobody would mention it because you will have scored a certain amount of goals already.
"I have been through this a thousand times, with everybody trying to figure out why or why not. We have to just continue to play and get chances."
Getting chances has not proven a problem. Capitalizing on them has been a challenge.
The Penguins were among the NHL's top 10 in average shots on goal with 30.1 as of yesterday. However, their shooting percentage, 9.6 percent, ranked toward the middle of the pack, well behind leaders Philadelphia (14.3), Calgary (13.1) and Toronto (12.1).
The Penguins' 14 five-on-five goals rated toward the bottom third of the league. Philadelphia and Ottawa had scored 22 and 20, respectively, through nine games.
Buffalo lost Daniel Briere and Chris Drury during free agency but had totaled 18 five-on-five goals over eight games.
|Some Penguins players' struggle to score goals dates to last season. Here's a look at the rough stretches experienced by a few of the club's standouts:|
|Mark Recchi||RW/LW||3 goals in 32 regular-season games|
|Jordan Staal||C/LW||3 goals in 25 regular-season games|
|*Evgeni Malkin||C/RW||7 goals in 33 regular-season games|
|Gary Roberts||LW||6 goals in 24 regular-season games|
|Ryan Malone||LW/RW||3 goals in 22 regular-season games|
|* -- Three goals in nine games this season|
The Penguins had been outscored by seven goals during five-on-five play.
"We do have to make sure we are more effective five-on-five," captain Sidney Crosby said. "You cannot always depend on your power play and penalty kill."
Crosby said the Penguins need to improve their work around the net to better create traffic in front of opposing goaltenders.
"We need to get a few more dirty goals," Crosby said. "If you look at the goals we do score, a lot of times they are right around the net. That is no fluke. You have to score like that."
A few more goals from their defense corps would also help.
The Penguins have received only four goals from their defensemen -- two each by Ryan Whitney and Sergei Gonchar. Ten teams had bested that total, including Columbus (five), Calgary (six), Montreal (seven) and Toronto (10).
Gonchar said the Penguins' defensemen by design are not "jumping up" to help the forwards in the offensive zone.
"We understand that defense comes first, and that is why we are not jumping up as much," Gonchar said. "Every mistake you make the other team is going to capitalize on it.
"We have such a great offense. The goals are going to come. I have confidence in our forwards. They are going to score without our help."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.