NHL makes Winter Classic modifications
The AMP Energy NHL Winter Classic at Ralph Wilson Stadium on New Year's Day is a regular-season game, but that will be the only thing regular about the league's first outdoor contest in the United States.
The league announced Saturday that the Penguins and host Buffalo Sabres will switch ends halfway through the third period to provide each club equal attack-zone time at the end of the rink less affected by weather conditions, specifically wind.
According to AccuWeather's web site, the latest forecast for the greater Buffalo area Tuesday calls for breezy and cold conditions, with a high of 29 and low of 11 degrees.
If a five-minute overtime is required for the Winter Classic, that period would also be divided in half, with teams switching ends at the 2:30 mark. In a shootout, each goaltender will hold the option of determining which net to defend. The possibility will exist for both goaltenders to defend the same net.
The length of intermissions and timeouts are subject to modification depending on weather conditions. Any decision will be made by game officials and will involve commissioner Gary Bettman and representatives of the league's players association.
Fans attending the game are urged to keep their tickets until the game's conclusion. In case of a postponement, the game will be scheduled for 7 p.m. Wednesday at Ralph Wilson Stadium.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.