Rangers' Mara rips 'classless' Malkin
They said it
“That's a classless act by a superstar. And there's no need for that in our game. We're up, 2-0, and it's not like it's a little slew-foot – it's a full kick if you watch the replay.”
-- Rangers defenseman Paul Mara, on a late slew-foot foul by Penguins center Evgeni Malkin, who was assessed a 10-minute misconduct penalty
"I'm getting used to it - shouldn't be that tough."
-- Penguins left wing Gary Roberts, who returned to the lineup for Game 4, on experience gained this season from coming back from injury-related absences.
Watch these guys
Left wing Petr Sykora, Penguins
He has scored four goals in as many games at Mellon Arena during the playoffs, including two in an opening-round Game 1 victory. After signing a two-year, $5 million deal last summer, Sykora said he loved playing in Pittsburgh. He was not kidding. Seventeen of his 28 goals during the regular-season were scored at home, where he recorded each of his three multiple-goal games.
Right wing Brendan Shanahan, Rangers
A playoff-tested veteran with Stanley Cup rings to back up his words, Shanahan knows the Rangers simply staved off elimination with a win Thursday in Game 4. Of course, Shanahan also is aware pressure will shift to the Penguins in Game 6 at Madison Square Garden on Monday - provided the Rangers can win Sunday in Game 5 at Mellon Arena.
The Penguins are 2-0 in Game 5s against the Rangers and 10-4 all-time in Game 5s played in Pittsburgh.
The Penguins have gone two months without losing consecutive games. They were defeated March 1 in Ottawa after falling Feb. 28 in Boston.
1 Jaromir Jagr, RW, Rangers
He burned his original team for two goals and an assist.
2 Henrik Lundqvist, G, Rangers
He stopped 29 shots, rebounding from a meek 12-save performance in Game 3.
3 Chris Drury, C, Rangers
Despite injured ribs, he played more than 20 minutes and won 15 of 24 faceoffs.
1 PENGUINS 5, RANGERS 4
Penguins lead series, 1-0
At Mellon Arena: Overcoming a 3-0 playoff deficit for the first time since Game 1 of the 1992 Stanley Cup final, the Penguins benefited from a late power-play chance. Captain Sidney Crosby's point shot bounced off center Evgeni Malkin for the winning goal with 2:41 remaining.
2 PENGUINS 2, RANGERS 0
Penguins lead series, 2-0
At Mellon Arena: Goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury recorded his second shutout in four home playoff games, stopping 26 shots. The Penguins killed each of the Rangers' six power plays, including two over the final 6:04.
3 PENGUINS 5, RANGERS 3
PENGUINS LEAD SERIES, 3-0
At Madison Square Garden: Center Evgeni Malkin scored twice and recorded his fourth multiple-point game of the playoffs, and goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury stopped 36 shots. The Penguins held the Rangers without a power-play goal on five opportunities, including over 1:14 of 5-on-3 play. The Penguins were 2 for 3 on the advantage.
4 RANGERS 3, PENGUINS 0
PENGUINS LEAD SERIES, 3-1
At Madison Square Garden: New York captain Jaromir Jagr scored his club's first and third goals, and center Brandon Dubinsky's early third-period power-play tally helped snap the Penguins' seven-game win streak. The Rangers outshot the Penguins, 34-29. It was only the second time this postseason the Penguins have surrendered more shots than their opponent.
5 RANGERS AT PENGUINS
2 p.m. * Sunday * Mellon Arena * WPXI-11
The Penguins never counted on winning every Stanley Cup playoff game in 2008, and they will feel confident about wrapping a second-round series against the Rangers at Mellon Arena. That confidence is justified. They were an East-best 26-10-5 at home during the regular season, including 16-2-3 since Jan. 1. They are 4-0 at home in the playoffs.
*6 PENGUINS AT RANGERS
7 p.m. * May 5 * Madison Square Garden * FSN
*7 RANGERS AT PENGUINS
7 p.m. * May 7 * Mellon Arena * FSN
-- *If necessary
Click here to launch.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.