Burning question: What happened to rookie right wing Tyler Kennedy's scoring touch?
Breakdown: Kennedy scored eight goals in his first 28 NHL games but has tallied only twice in his past 43, including an 0-for-16 performance in the Stanley Cup playoffs. He is the only regular Penguins forward without a playoff goal.
PuckSpeak: "In junior (hockey), I went through something like this," Kennedy said. "It's part of hockey. I've tried my hardest. They're not going in for me right now. What can I do?"
Looking ahead: Certainly, the Penguins have greater concerns than Kennedy's inability to score goals. After all, Hart Trophy finalist Evgeni Malkin has scored only one more goal than Kennedy over the past six games. Kennedy actually has outshot Malkin over that span, 11-10.
Still, Kennedy needs to find his scoring touch, and soon.
His is not a case of limited opportunities.
He is skating on a third line with center Jordan Staal - arguably the Penguins' most consistent forward in the Stanley Cup final. Kennedy also was a fixture on the Penguins' second power-play unit.
Kennedy said coaches have not addressed his goal drought in a negative way, preferring to focus on the positive that is the energy he brings and the speed with which he plays.
Perhaps they should shift their focus.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.