Offers fail to impress Pens' Shero
OTTAWA -- General manager Ray Shero listened to offers from several clubs Friday prior to the first round of the NHL Entry Draft at Scotiabank Place.
It is no shock that Shero would not divulge details of those offers. But it may be a surprise that teams thought he might consider moving star center Evgeni Malkin or defenseman Ryan Whitney.
One agent told the Tribune-Review that Shero was not shopping those players -- just listening to offers. Another agent said he would be very surprised if Shero moved either player -- both of whom he has identified as core players.
It is believed that at least six teams with top-10 picks inquired about Malkin's availability. Three clubs are thought to have bid for Whitney.
Instead of a headline-garnering trade, Shero stood pat yesterday - and so did the Penguins, who did not have a pick in the first three rounds.
The Penguins are not slated to pick until the fourth round when the draft resumes today at 10 a.m. Several agents believe the Penguins may try to move into the second or third round but doubt a rights-for-pick deal is possible.
The Penguins have 12 players who can become unrestricted free agents on July 1. They could deal any of those players for a pick and provide their trade partner with exclusive negotiating rights to those players.
Shero would not say if that was ever the plan for left wing Ryan Malone, who told the Tribune-Review earlier this week he would test the free-agent market -- effectively ending any chance he would be moved.
Shero said Malone's declaration did not "bother (him)."
"I don't begrudge him or any of these players the right to go to July 1," Shero said.
One player Shero wants to keep off the market is defenseman Brooks Orpik, who is represented by Lewis Gross.
Orpik is expected to meet with Gross on Monday, and they are likely to discuss parameters for a deal to be offered by the Penguins.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.