Penguins' Crosby playing it cool
There is a reason Sidney Crosby hasn't addressed the harsh words directed his way last week by Washington Capitals winger Alexander Semin.
"Nobody asked me," Crosby said Tuesday after an intense Penguins' practice at Southpointe. "I'd be better off keeping my opinion to myself.
"He can say what he wants."
Semin certainly did last week, asking "what's so special about Sidney Crosby?" in an interview with yahoosports.com.
"I don't see anything special there," Semin said. "Yes, he does skate well, has a good head, good pass. But there's nothing else."
Semin added: "If you take any player, even if he is dead wood, and start promoting him, you'll get a star."
Washington owner Ted Leonsis told ESPN.com on Monday that "something was lost in translation" when Semin, a Russian, spoke via a translator to a Yahoo! Sports reporter.
Crosby, who won the individual scoring championship and MVP after his last full season in 2006-07, yesterday called Semin "a good player" with "great hands."
He also lamented the likelihood of future discussions pertaining to this subject. The Capitals and Penguins have three meetings remaining this season, the next game Jan. 14 at Mellon Arena.
A rivalry already exists between Washington right wing Alexander Ovechkin, who succeeded Crosby as scoring champion and MVP last season, and Penguins' center Evgeni Malkin. The young Russian stars finished 1-2 in the scoring race and MVP voting last season, and Ovechkin has upped the physical ante against Malkin in recent games between the teams.
Crosby said yesterday that individual rivalries are "healthy for hockey," agreeing they help promote the sport in the United States.
"I don't think there's ever a problem with that," Crosby said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.