Pens move practice to Boston
• Old Man Winter has punished the Penguins this holiday season. They were forced to move a scheduled Wednesday practice from Pittsburgh to Boston due to inclement weather in the northeast. The Penguins chartered a plane that left Pittsburgh around 9 a.m., landed in Boston around 11 a.m. and practiced at Harvard University in nearby Cambridge, Mass. The change in plans was made in anticipation of an afternoon snowstorm that eventually dumped nearly 9 inches on the greater Boston arena. This development came slightly more than a week after the Penguins were forced to travel to Buffalo via bus for a game against the Sabres on Dec. 22 because of a snowstorm.
• Practice was short but taxing and included the surprise returns of right wing Tyler Kennedy and defenseman Kris Letang, each of whom participated in full drills. Kennedy (sprained knee) has missed 13 consecutive games dating to sustaining his injury Dec. 3 at the New York Rangers. Letang (undisclosed injury) has not played in the past four games since he was hurt on Dec. 22 at Buffalo. Neither player is expected to dress tonight for a game at Boston.
• Years from now, hockey historians may recall 2008 as the Year of Evgeni Malkin, who was dominant despite failing to record a point in three of the final four games played in the calendar year. Malkin's 2008 stats (81 regular-season games): 47 goals, 77 assists, 124 points and plus-39 rating. Malkin recorded multiple points in 37 games (45.7 percent) and was held without a point in only 18 (22.2 percent).
102 -- Regular-season points earned by Penguins in 2008, out of a possible 162.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.