ShareThis Page

A disastrous day for the Penguins

| Sunday, Jan. 4, 2009

Things are going so poorly for the Penguins that Sidney Crosby picked a fight and couldn't even get his opponent to respond.

A humiliating, 6-1 loss to the Florida Panthers on Saturday took a wild turn with 2:59 left in the second period, when Crosby pounced on Panthers forward Brett McLean in the faceoff circle.

McLean did not reciprocate. Crosby pulled McLean's jersey over his head, tried to throw some punches and finally slammed McLean face-first to the ice.

"I asked him to go, and he said yes, and usually, yes means yes," Crosby said. "I guess he didn't take me seriously. I mean, I wouldn't have wasted 20 minutes in the box for that."

Actually, Crosby served 19 minutes for the second fight of his four-year career. That included his first-ever two-minute instigator penalty, plus a two-minute unsportsmanlike-conduct penalty, a five-minute fighting major and a 10-minute misconduct.

McLean was assessed a five-minute major.

Crosby easily could have been handed a game misconduct, as NHL rules stipulate that "a player who is deemed to be the instigator and aggressor" in a fight shall be assessed a game misconduct.

McLean, for his part, claimed he never heard Crosby's challenge.

"He said something before the draw," McLean said, "but I didn't really pick up on it."

The Panthers were leading, 4-1, at the time and were well on their way to dealing the Penguins a fifth consecutive home loss, the team's longest such skid since midway through the 2005-06 season.

Florida hadn't scored six goals in a game in nearly a year.

Panthers veteran Nick Boynton ripped Crosby.

"I thought it was unprofessional," Boynton said. "You don't jump a guy while his head's down, taking a faceoff. That's pretty immature and childish."

The loss dropped the Penguins into ninth place in the Eastern Conference, a point behind the Buffalo Sabres. The Penguins are 4-10 in their past 14 games, with five of the losses coming to teams under .500.

Fans booed the Penguins off the ice at the end of the second period.

"We needed to correct this three weeks ago," forward Matt Cooke said.

Added defenseman Brooks Orpik: "I think it's pretty clear in the minds of all the guys that it's a pretty dangerous time."

Coach Michel Therrien thought his team played with good energy early but sagged when Florida scored two first-period goals to take a 2-0 lead. He placed blame for the loss squarely on his goaltenders, Marc-Andre Fleury and Dany Sabourin, each of whom gave up three goals on 12 shots.

Fleury came into the game ranked 34th in the 30-team NHL in goals-against average (2.96) and 28th in save percentage (.907).

Therrien pulled both goalies — Fleury was removed after the first period, then reinstated for the third — and subsequently pulled himself from his post-game media session, in the middle of a question.

As Therrien stalked away from the podium, a reporter asked, "Can you win with these players, Mike?"

The coach did not provide an answer, kind of like the power play of late. Evgeni Malkin was moved up front, but the unit went 0-for-3 to make it 0-for-24 in the past six games.

Poor special-teams play conspired with defensive breakdowns, blown scoring chances and shaky goaltending — Florida scored on three of its first six shots — to produce the Penguins' worst loss of the season and their worst home loss since Feb. 2, 2006 (7-2 against Ottawa).

All of which leads one to wonder if general manager Ray Shero might be forced to shake things up.

Crosby was asked if it's getting to that point.

"We're not making it easy," he said. "That's for sure."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.