ShareThis Page

Satan, Boucher add punch for Penguins

| Tuesday, May 19, 2009

The only games defenseman Philippe Boucher and winger Miroslav Satan had been playing at the outset of these playoffs were post-practice versions of 3-on-3.

That's how guys who aren't dressing for games try to stay conditioned and involved, scoring goals in empty arenas that no one ever sees.

Monday night against Carolina in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference final, Boucher and Satan scored goals that mattered, delighting another Mellon Arena sellout crowd and helping the Penguins to a 3-2 victory.

Game 2 is scheduled for Thursday night at Mellon Arena.

Satan's first goal of the playoffs opened the scoring at 9:17 of the first period.

Boucher's first of the playoffs at 11:33 of the third re-established the two-goal lead the Penguins would need to outlast the 'Canes.

"Playing 3-on-3 and doing laps at the end of practice is not the most fun, but when you haven't played much all year long it's what you need to do," Boucher said. "You hope you're put in a situation where you can help the team down the road.

"I wasn't sure what my role was going to be a few weeks ago. I'm not sure every night. I didn't know I was going to play (Monday night) until warm-ups. When you can help the team win, I guess doing laps is worth it."

Satan not only lost his spot in the lineup during the regular season, he was banished to AHL Wilkes-Barre/Scranton at the trade deadline before being recalled just before the start of the playoffs.

"Always, when we weren't playing, we tried to have fun in practice and wait for our opportunity," Satan said. "An opportunity came for both of us and we're trying to make the best of it.

"Definitely, it feels good for anybody who can contribute. Game by game the coaches are giving me more tapping on the shoulder, a little more trust. I'm trying to use the time on the ice as well as I can."

Both players are finally getting a regular opportunity now that the Penguins have used seven defensemen and 11 forwards over the past four games.

"Seven defensemen is an all right thing, I guess," Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said. "In a perfect world, six (defensemen) is a situation I prefer more.

"But rarely are we in a perfect world."

Bylsma first resorted to such an imperfect improvisation for Game 5 of the Eastern Conference semifinals against Washington. With defenseman Sergei Gonchar out due to a knee injury, the Penguins went with Boucher and AHL call-up Alex Goligoski on the blueline for Games 5 and 6 against the Capitals.

The extra defenseman in the lineup made winger Pascal Dupuis the odd-man out up front and created an opening for Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin to double-shift occasionally as the fourth-line center between Craig Adams and Satan.

Gonchar returned and replaced Goligoski for Game 7 against the Capitals, and the lineup remained unchanged for Game 1 against Carolina.

In addition to being worked in periodically five-on-five, Boucher and Satan also see time on the second power-play unit.

Boucher also had an assist in Game 1 against the Hurricanes.

Satan's goal gave him four points in the four games the Pens have played with the seven-defensemen approach.

The two became the 14th and 15th Penguins players to register goals this postseason.

"We like to believe we're deep," Boucher said. "We have some good players who aren't playing right now."

Those are the guys currently tearing it up after practice in 3-on-3.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.