Slumping Kunitz looks to right his ship
Fans and members of the hockey media aren't the only ones talking about Penguins left wing Chris Kunitz's goal-scoring drought — 19 games, including 14 to open the Stanley Cup playoffs.
Kunitz admitted Tuesday after an optional practice at Southpointe that he, too, has discussed his scoring slump with teammates, coaches and, well, pretty much everybody he knows — excluding his newborn son.
"You go over film, do different things, see what maybe you've done different in the past," he said, adding that he must do a better job "moving (his) feet and going to tough areas where goals are scored."
Kunitz, who has displayed no signs of discouragement, has recorded seven assists and registered a plus-1 rating in the playoffs. However, after opening the postseason with a (bruising) bang against the Philadelphia Flyers, he rates just 19th overall with 37 hits.
He also isn't directing many pucks toward the cage.
Kunitz was not credited with a shot Monday in the Penguins' Game 1 victory over the Carolina Hurricanes to start the Eastern Conference final. He has not registered more than two shots in eight games and has totaled one or none in six of those contests.
Still, coach Dan Bylsma did not come close to hinting yesterday that Kunitz's role as a top-line winger will change in any way - though Bylsma would like to see Kunitz return to the physical form that should blend ideally with the playmaking skill of top center Sidney Crosby.
"Every player has a foundation to their game; they have their role," Bylsma said. "(Kunitz's) role is straight-line, aggressive hockey to the net, (and) physical. If things aren't going well for him, he should always make sure he returns to that foundation. We've talked about it. He has to focus."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.