ShareThis Page

Pens' barrage of shots producing results

| Saturday, May 23, 2009

Their coach calls it playing the right way. Their opponents consider it a game of playing keep away. Either way, the Penguins have placed their Stanley Cup playoff fate in the hands of this directive: Fire away.

The Penguins boast an 11-game streak of outshooting their opponents heading into Game 3 of the Eastern Conference final against the Carolina Hurricanes at 7:30 tonight at RBC Center in Raleigh, N.C.

The Penguins own a 2-0 lead in the best-of-seven series, thanks in part to a blistering barrage of 35.6 shots a game that is accounting for 3.81 goals a game in that span.

"That's why we do it," Penguins captain Sidney Crosby said. "Whether it's the goalie or the team, hopefully, we're going to wear teams down that way. When a goalie is facing that many shots, you're going to get rebounds that hopefully go your way, and you're going to get breaks.

"When you can do that, the better chance you give yourself."

Since losing back-to-back games to Philadelphia in the first round — including a 3-1 Game 4 loss in which the Flyers held a 46-26 edge in shots — the Penguins have taken 30 or more shots in nine of their past 11 games. They are 3-1 when taking 40-plus, with the defeat a 4-3 overtime loss to Washington in Game 6 of the conference semifinal.

That includes the 7-4 victory over Carolina on Thursday at Mellon Arena. The Penguins fired 42 shots at goalie Cam Ward, who was previously undefeated in five Game 2s with a 1.18 goals-against average and .956 save percentage yet allowed four goals in the first two periods.

The Hurricanes, however, attribute Ward's wobbly play not to the Penguins' penchant for punching it in the net but deficiencies in their own zone.

"We've got to be better defensively in front of them," Carolina center Eric Staal said. "I think just keeping more shots on to the outside and less of those prime scoring areas. If we do that, he'll have a good chance of making those saves."

To do that, Carolina will have to slow down the NHL's Nos. 1 and 2 playoff scorers in Evgeni Malkin (10 goals, 25 points) and Crosby (13 goals, 24 points), who have combined for 20 shots and nine points in the series' first two games.

"We've had some breakdowns on our end, and they're just too good," Hurricanes center and captain Rod Brind'Amour said. "They've got tremendous talent. If given those opportunities, they're going to bury it. We're just going to have to be better."

Penguins coach Dan Bylsma believes that the scoring surge is not so much a result of taking a high quantity of shots but by playing a style of hockey best suited to the postseason. Bylsma wants the Penguins to control the puck in their offensive zone and crash the crease so as to score on multiple chances.

For example, Crosby got the game's first goal just inches from the net. Malkin provided the Penguins' second tally on a rebound. That opened up the ice for plays such as Max Talbot's second-period breakaway and Malkin's circling behind the net for a blind backhand in the third.

"We don't start off by saying we want to outshoot the other team," Bylsma said. "We have an idea of where we want to play and how we want to play the game, and if we play well, we end up in the offensive zone more. Shots to the net, pucks to the net, bodies to the net, is the recipe for any goalie."

And keeping the puck away from foes is another ingredient for winning playoff games on the road.

"It's about trying to play the right way, so you can continue to get pucks into the offensive zone," Bylsma said. "That's a great way to take crowds out of it."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.