Penguins' Orpik sees room for improvement
RALEIGH, N.C. — Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik knows his club can play better.
On Saturday night, after a convincing 6-2 victory in Game 3 of a best-of-seven Eastern Conference final to take a 3-0 series lead over the Carolina Hurricanes, Orpik spoke of what the Penguins must improve upon to close out the Hurricanes in Game 4 at RBC Center on Tuesday.
"(In Game 2), and in both of their goals (in Game 3), we have to be better around our net," Orpik said of the Hurricanes' success getting to loose pucks off rebounds from saves by Penguins goalie Marc-Andre Fleury.
"Our forwards aren't turning pucks over, which allows us to have good gaps — and we've had good gaps, so we're forcing them to chip pucks. They're not getting much off the rushes. They're just getting into the zone and firing pucks near the net.
"It's not anything fancy, and it's up to us to take that away."
Neither the Penguins nor Hurricanes practiced Sunday, but each club will return to its regular routine today.
Orpik said he expects a spirited effort from the Hurricanes, even though only two NHL teams have rallied to win a best-of-seven series after trailing, 3-0.
"This team, every single time you think they're down and out, they bounce right back," he said. "I don't think anybody in our room feels that comfortable. We feel fortunate to be in this position, but at the same time we have a tremendous amount of respect for those guys and how resilient they are."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.