Controversial Cherry praises Pens' Crosby
RALEIGH, N.C. — Wildly popular and controversial Canadian hockey analyst Don Cherry has changed his mind about Penguins captain Sidney Crosby.
Early in Crosby's career, Cherry claimed Crosby dived and whined too much. He also ripped Crosby for what he termed a "hot-dog" move in a junior game (Crosby scooped the puck lacrosse-style, rested it on his blade and stuffed it into the net) and said it was "ridiculous" that then-Penguins coach Michel Therrien named Crosby an alternate captain in Crosby's second season.
"No kid should have as much to say as he's got to say," Cherry said then. "Yapping at the referees, doing the whole thing. Golden boy."
Cherry likes what he sees now, based on his comments Tuesday morning at the RBC Center, during the Penguins' morning skate.
"He blocks shots, takes the draws now and kills penalties," Cherry said. "All I said when everybody got on me, I said, 'Stop yelling at the referees, stop diving and throwing your head back.' What happens is the referees won't (give you calls)."
Cherry laughed and added, "He listened to me, just like (Alex) Ovechkin listened to me. I've been around a little bit. I know how the referees feel. They're only human. (Crosby's) a complete hockey player now. Before he was just an offensive DH, like in baseball."
Like millions of Canadians, Crosby grew up loving Cherry's act during the popular Coach's Corner segment on "Hockey Night in Canada." He was asked yesterday if Cherry's earlier jabs bothered him.
"A little," Crosby said. "It wasn't easy. I mean, I grew up watching him, and I didn't expect to be hearing things negative. At the same time, it's something I didn't read into a whole lot. I just tried to keep playing the same way and doing the same things.
"People are always going to have their opinions, whether they're good or bad. Either way, I don't try to change too much."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.